Many patients ask which is "the best approach" for forehead feminisation, but that question has no single answer: it depends on the starting point (the shape of the forehead, the hairline, hair density) and on each person's priorities: avoiding a visible scar, bringing the hairline forward, lifting the brows significantly... Before choosing, it's worth understanding what each of the three available approaches allows, and what it doesn't.
A common starting point
The three approaches (hairline, coronal and posterior) share the same path, from ear to ear, and the same goal: feminising the upper third of the face. What changes between them is where the incision sits, and that determines what can be done through it, and what scar remains.
Hairline (pretrichial / trichial)
It's the only one of the three that allows the hairline to be brought forward, through a hairline lowering. That is, in fact, the only real justification for choosing it: shortening the forehead by advancing where the hair begins.
It's indicated above all in foreheads with a rounded hairline contour, without recession at the temples. Advancement surgery doesn't change the shape of that line, it only moves it forward naturally. Trying to reshape it during the advancement increases the risk of an unnatural result or an unsightly scar. The advancement also has a limit, around 3 cm at most, which varies from patient to patient: age, skin quality and other factors.
Through this approach the frontal and orbital bone can also be worked on if the case requires it, and it allows the brows to be anchored higher (brow lift). In many countries it is, in fact, the standard approach for forehead feminisation.
The main drawback is that the scar is exposed: any issue with healing is far more visible than with the other two approaches. In some cases it may eventually require a hair transplant to camouflage it better.
Coronal
It sits hidden within the hair, but reaching the frontal bone requires dissecting a larger area than with the hairline approach. It doesn't allow the hairline to be brought forward; quite the opposite: the hairline usually rises, with a recession of between 2 and 5 mm.
It used to be widely used for the brow lift, but today it has fallen out of favour for that indication. It can sometimes produce wide or hypertrophic scars, from excess tension at closure or from placing the incision where the hair changes its direction of growth. Even so, it remains far less exposed than the hairline scar.
We recommend it in some patients with a very short forehead, and in those who need a significant brow lift alongside feminisation of the upper third. One caveat: in advanced alopecia, the scar can end up more visible if the density and quality of the surrounding hair isn't optimal.
Posterior
It sits behind the crown. It's the area with the least closure tension of the three, which favours a scar that is practically imperceptible in the vast majority of cases. It's always hidden by the hair, and it's the area least affected by alopecia.
It's the approach that dissects the largest area, though this doesn't usually translate into problems with the scalp, its blood supply or its nerves, as long as the dissection is carried out in the correct planes.
In terms of the brows, it's the approach that offers the least control over the lift, or the most complex to execute, without experience in this technique. Recovery is equivalent to the other two approaches. The one added inconvenience is the position of the scar: in the first days, resting your head on the bed means resting directly on it, which makes sleep somewhat less comfortable. We recommend pillows with cervical support for the first 3–4 days.
Can it be combined with a hair transplant?
The two approaches that pass through the scalp (coronal and posterior) allow a strip of follicles (up to 2,000 follicular units) to be harvested from the scar area itself for a simultaneous hair transplant, if the case requires it. The hairline approach doesn't offer this possibility in the same way.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Choosing an approach is a personal decision: none of the three is objectively better than the other two. What matters is knowing, before surgery, what you gain and what you give up with each option, so you don't regret it afterwards.
If you're unsure which fits your forehead shape and your priorities, the consultation is the place to resolve it with your specific case on the table.
→ Book your free consultation now
