By now we all know someone (a friend, an acquaintance, someone in our circle) for whom what started as a small aesthetic touch-up to the lips has ended up, over time, as a volume that no longer resembles anything natural. It isn't an isolated case. It's a pattern we see often enough to want to talk about it plainly.
Let's take it step by step, because there are important nuances here that are almost never explained.
When filler works, it works very well. The problem is that this isn't usually the norm.
Credit where it's due: a well-injected lip, with the right volume, the appropriate product and proper intervals between top-ups, can bring a genuinely beautiful change. This exists and it works. The problem is that, in day-to-day clinical practice, it isn't what usually happens. What we encounter more often are lip shapes and sizes that simply don't exist in human anatomy, or that are unsuited to that particular person's face.
Lip shape is highly particular and enormously variable anatomically. Specific classifications exist, such as Harris's tubercle classification, precisely to describe that diversity.
Trying to force that individual anatomy with filler, pushing it towards a standard format that doesn't belong to it, tends to cause problems. And we're not only talking about aesthetics: we're also talking about lip dynamics, how the lip moves when speaking, smiling or gesturing. When that becomes distorted, product migration appears, along with what in clinic we call, not too gently, the "alienisation" of the face: lips with near-impossible volumes that catch the eye in a way that is not exactly flattering.
It isn't only aesthetics: there are real functional consequences
This is important and rarely explained: excess volume in the lip isn't a purely cosmetic problem. It alters the lymphatic drainage of the area and also the muscle dynamics, since the way the different anatomical layers glide over one another is disrupted by these deposits of hyaluronic acid, which furthermore draw water towards themselves. On top of that comes the immune response: the area is subjected to constant stimulation, with cells recruited to try to encapsulate those deposits of product.
On products: not everything "natural" means safe
Here we have to be direct about something constantly sold as reassurance: the idea that materials "belonging to the body", such as hyaluronic acid or fat, are automatically well tolerated and cause no long-term problems. In our clinical experience, this doesn't hold up as clearly as advertised. It's true that the volumising effect from water attraction decreases over time, and that most of that reduction happens in the first weeks. But what remains deposited in each person, and how it behaves over the years, is far more variable and far less "simply reabsorbable" than patients are usually told.
And that's without getting into the products once promoted as star solutions for this area (liquid silicone, methacrylate, among others...) which ended up causing serious complications in many of the people injected with them. It's well-known history in our specialty, but worth remembering whenever someone proposes lip filler as if it were a gesture without consequences.
If we had to choose a lip filler material, we would opt for a hyaluronic acid specifically formulated for this region and not for autologous fat, which in our experience doesn't behave particularly well in the lip either, despite the intuition that "your own is always better". And many of the hyaluronic acids marketed as "lip-specific" don't behave, in practice, exactly as the manufacturer promises either.
The underlying problem: repetition
Beyond the choice of product, the bigger problem we observe is another one: repetition over time and in quantity, driven by that juicy, hydrated-lip effect that appears during the first month after injection and which is largely produced simply by the local inflammation of the technique itself. That temporary effect creates, in some patients, a self-reinforcing pattern of repetition.
And here's the physical consequence of that repetition: excess volume sustained over time causes the perilabial tissues to gradually stretch, with an effect comparable to a balloon inflated and deflated over and over. In time, those tissues lose their retractile capacity. The result isn't only aesthetic, but a real lengthening of the distance between the base of the nose and the lip: the well-known "long, puffy lip" which, paradoxically, is exactly the opposite of what the patient was after when she started.
What if the problem isn't "not enough lip", but something else?
Before proposing any solution, the first thing we do is assess the real cause of that perception of a thin, under-volumised or "long" lip. That cause can be skeletal or dental in origin, and that's precisely the first thing to rule out.
Skeletal causes are the ones least often treated in the end, because understandably many patients are reluctant to intervene on the position of their bones just to improve their smile or the look of their lip. When the origin is dental, the solution can lie in orthodontics, which improves the support the tooth itself gives the lip.
That said, not every case requires surgery. But we do see, more and more often, young patients who benefit from a simple operation to shorten the distance between lip and nose, which also creates an eversion of the vermilion (more red lip on show) with a feeling of greater volume in the upper lip, without injecting any product at all. That's the lip lift.
What exactly the lip lift is
There are different technical variants:
· the direct one, with the scar placed at the very border of the lip;
· the indirect one, with the scar hidden under the base of the nose.
It's a surgery usually performed under local anaesthesia, with a short operating time (under an hour), done as a day case, with a straightforward recovery (roughly a week, with swelling and stitches present during that period) and with an effect visible from the very moment of the operation.
Beyond the rejuvenating effect on the lip, the lip lift also increases the amount of tooth visible with the lip at rest, which has an additional favourable effect on the smile.
For all these reasons, in cases with the right indication (a long lip, a thin lip, lack of incisor show at rest, or a perceived lack of lip volume) we usually prefer this surgical option over filler. Not because the lip lift by itself resolves the origin of the problem, since in most cases that origin has an underlying skeletal or dental component, beyond the added effect of age in older patients. But because it improves those causes in a far more permanent and stable way than filler, which at best disguises them temporarily and at worst makes them worse over time.
As I always note at the end, this content is for general information and reflects our clinical view based on consultation experience. It doesn't replace an individual assessment: every case requires an in-person examination to determine the real cause and the most appropriate treatment.
→ Book your free consultation now
